Author summary
72% 2 analyzed articles/videos 687 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gabrielle Russon results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 362 hits . Analysis detected 1,966 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,061 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of 71% (1,837 of 6,316 authors). This Gabrielle Russon is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group. Gabrielle Russon
Author details
Total words: 2,061
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
71% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.9% percentile 3.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.5% 7.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 17.6% 17.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.0% 4.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 10.5% 10.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 17.6%, sitewide 11.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.5%, sitewide 15.9% Halo Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 6.8%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.5%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Author 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Burden of Proof: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.4% False Dilemma: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst