Publication summary
63% 13 analyzed articles/videos 8,816 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Florida Politics results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.2% saturation with 2,169 hits . Analysis detected 19,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,448 analyzed words across 13 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 35% (250 of 384 publications). This Florida Politics is better (less manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 26,448
Article count: 13
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.0% percentile 1.6% BS Score13 analyzed articles26.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 7.2% 7.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 8.2% 8.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 7.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst