Author summary
35%2 analyzed articles/videos2,032 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jesse Scheckner results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 762 hits. Analysis detected 3,932 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,096 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,750 of 6,299 authors). This Jesse Scheckner is better (less manipulative) than 75.40% of the peer group.
Jesse Scheckner
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
25%Jesse Scheckner (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,096
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510024.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.5%12.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Ad Hominem: Author 5.4%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate