Poll: Ashley Litwin Diego close behind Lucia Báez-Geller in HD 106 Primary 46%

By Jesse Scheckner59%

7/22/2026, 3:17:08 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Halo Effect, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 20.2% saturation with 114 hits. Analysis detected 1,083 faulty-reasoning hits from 563 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 48.1% and a BS Rank of 46% (11,856 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 54.20% of the article peer group.

Ashley Litwin Diego is within striking distance of fellow Democrat Lucia Báez-Geller heading into the Primary home stretch for House District 106, new internal polling shows. 
A survey this month by Plantation-based MDW Communications , which is working for Litwin Diego, found she and Báez-Geller, a former Miami-Dade School Board member, have identical support  39.4%  among voters who received information about the candidates provided by Litwin Diego’s camp. 
MDW didn’t share the information given or what the candidates’ pre-information numbers were. 
Litwin Diego, a lawyer, also saw a net favorability of plus-41 percentage points  a “remarkable” finding, MDW noted, considering Litwin Diego is a first-time candidate who was “virtually unknown a year ago.” 
“Ashley Litwin Diego has the momentum in this race,” an MDW memo said. 
“While Báez-Geller is slightly better known as a previous officeholder who has run multiple times, Ashley Litwin Diego’s story and background as a political outsider resonates with voters who are fed up with the status quo.” 
About 21.1% of voters likely to cast ballots in the Aug. 
18 Primary said they remained undecided in the contest. 
Image via MDW Communications. 
Data from the poll, which used a 252-voter sample and had a 6.6-point margin of error at the 95% confidence level, comes as Báez-Geller and Litwin Diego continue to outraise the incumbent Republican in the race, Rep. 
Fabián Basabe , whom a jury last week found liable for sexually harassing and defaming two former House employees. 
Since launching her campaign last October, Litwin Diego has raised nearly $261,000 through her campaign account and political committee , including $55,000 in self-loans that are fully refundable if unspent. 
She had about $68,000 left heading into mid-July after active spending, including a five-figure ad buy her campaign announced this month. 
Báez-Geller, meanwhile, amassed more than $324,000 since filing for the race a year ago. 
Of that, $250,000 was self-loaned. 
She had about $134,000 remaining by July 10. 
Basabe, who is now seeking a third term, reported raising nearly $140,000 since winning re-election in 2024 between his campaign account and political committee . 
He reported $16,000 in self-loans and, notably, $140,000 in in-kind aid, mostly from the Florida House Republican Campaign Committee for phone banking and consulting expenses. 
He had just over $18,000 in cash by the last reporting deadline. 
HD 106 , which covers a coastal strip of Miami-Dade between Miami Beach and Aventura, remains among Florida’s most flippable districts, having gone to President Donald Trump by 9 percentage points in 2024 and to former President Joe Biden four years earlier by 10 points, according to MCI Maps . 
Basabe, a former reality TV personality and socialite, defeated former Bay Harbor Islands Mayor Jordan Leonard in 2022 by less than a percentage point to succeed term-limited Democratic Rep. 
Joe Geller  who has since replaced Báez-Geller, no relation, on the Miami-Dade School Board  in HD 106. 
He won re-election by a 4-point margin two years later. 
Last week, Basabe was found liable in a civil suit brought by a former aide, the aide’s mother and a former intern and was ordered to pay them $450,000 in damages. 
A separate suit the plaintiffs brought against the House, which they accuse of insufficiently investigating their claims against Basabe, remains pending. 
The General Election is Nov. 
3. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.2%Jesse Scheckner: 4.2%Florida Politics: 2.6%Confirmation Bias20.2%This article: 9.8%Jesse Scheckner: 0.7%Florida Politics: 1.1%Anchoring Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 1.2%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 8.9%Jesse Scheckner: 2.5%Florida Politics: 1.3%Representativeness Heuristic8.9%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.1%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Jesse Scheckner: 2.2%Florida Politics: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias2.3%This article: 8.3%Jesse Scheckner: 3.0%Florida Politics: 6.3%Framing Effect8.3%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.5%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 1.5%Florida Politics: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 5.3%Jesse Scheckner: 0.9%Florida Politics: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect5.3%This article: 5.9%Jesse Scheckner: 0.4%Florida Politics: 3.8%Optimism Bias5.9%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.6%Florida Politics: 0.8%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 14.0%Jesse Scheckner: 9.7%Florida Politics: 6.9%Negativity Bias14.0%This article: 8.7%Jesse Scheckner: 4.9%Florida Politics: 3.6%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 4.4%Jesse Scheckner: 0.6%Florida Politics: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error4.4%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.6%Florida Politics: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 2.7%Florida Politics: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 12.3%Jesse Scheckner: 5.3%Florida Politics: 5.0%Halo Effect12.3%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.9%Florida Politics: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Jesse Scheckner: 2.1%Florida Politics: 1.4%Recency Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.2%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 4.2%Florida Politics: 0.9%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 0.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.9%Jesse Scheckner: 5.9%Florida Politics: 6.0%Appeal to Authority5.9%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 1.0%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 3.7%Jesse Scheckner: 1.8%Florida Politics: 2.5%Hasty Generalization3.7%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 1.2%Florida Politics: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 5.6%Florida Politics: 2.2%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 6.4%Jesse Scheckner: 5.9%Florida Politics: 5.5%Appeal to Emotion6.4%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 6.6%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 1.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.6%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.3%Jesse Scheckner: 0.6%Florida Politics: 0.4%Burden of Proof2.3%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 8.9%Jesse Scheckner: 0.6%Florida Politics: 0.2%Composition/Division8.9%This article: 14.0%Jesse Scheckner: 4.0%Florida Politics: 1.2%Anecdotal14.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 10.3%Jesse Scheckner: 1.5%Florida Politics: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)10.3%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.9%Jesse Scheckner: 1.2%Florida Politics: 1.3%Unattributed Quote5.9%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.4%Florida Politics: 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 10.1%Jesse Scheckner: 1.5%Florida Politics: 3.5%Biased Writer Voice10.1%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.7%Florida Politics: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.3%Florida Politics: 0.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jesse Scheckner: 0.0%Florida Politics: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 6.4%Jesse Scheckner: 0.5%Florida Politics: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…6.4%

563 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers15%attributed speech480writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageMDW Communications • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMCI Maps • 50 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

MDW Communications

100%flagged-word coverage
33 attributed words40% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%MDW Communications: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-11.9 ptsWriter: 11.9%MDW Communications: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -7.5 ptsWriter: 7.5%MDW Communications: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.