Topic summary
⁠54%1 analyzed article/video563 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Polling Data results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Self-Serving Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 222 hits. Analysis detected 1,598 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,689 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (5,591 of 16,562 topics). This Polling Data is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group.
Polling Data
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,689
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510066.2% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.8%7.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.8%0.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 5.7%5.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Recency Bias: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos