Topic summary
26% 6 analyzed articles/videos 2,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Primary Election results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Halo Effect , and Indoctrination , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 782 hits . Analysis detected 8,378 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,086 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 19% (13,559 of 16,562 topics). This Primary Election is better (less manipulative) than 81.90% of the peer group. Primary Election
Topic details
Total words: 11,086
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
18% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.1% percentile 1.8% BS Score6 analyzed articles11.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.7% 6.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.0% 7.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst