Author summary
70%1 analyzed article/video416 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Drew Wilson results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 109 hits. Analysis detected 988 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,248 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,744 of 6,244 authors). This Drew Wilson is worse (more manipulative) than 72.10% of the peer group.
Drew Wilson
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
73%Drew Wilson (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,248
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

72% percentile
025507510072.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.2%6.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.6%2.6%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Author 5.8%5.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 5.4%5.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 2.5%2.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 5.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Author 5.8%, sitewide 1.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Status Quo Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Nature: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos