Publication summary
⁠21%1 analyzed article/video456 analyzed words
BS Summary: These KERO 23 ABC News Bakersfield results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 195 hits. Analysis detected 885 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (90 of 379 publications). This KERO 23 ABC News Bakersfield is worse (more manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group.
KERO 23 ABC News Bakersfield
Publication ranking list
Publication details
Total words: 1,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

77% percentile
025507510076.5% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 2.2%2.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 3.4%3.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Publication 9.1%9.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.4%2.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Publication 1.5%1.5%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Publication 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 9.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Publication 14.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Composition/Division: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Publication 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%No True Scotsman: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Unattributed Quote: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos