Author summary
⁠99%1 analyzed article/video338 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sally Freels results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Self-Serving Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.2% saturation with 337 hits. Analysis detected 1,790 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,014 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (705 of 6,350 authors). This Sally Freels is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
Sally Freels
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠89%Sally Freels (selected)7%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,014
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

89% percentile
025507510088.9% percentile
6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 33.2%33.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 25.4%25.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 1.1%1.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.2%12.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 14.3%14.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 8.8%8.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Author 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Author 33.2%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Author 12.2%, sitewide 26.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 25.4%, sitewide 0.5%Negativity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 9.5%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Author 14.3%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Author 8.8%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.7%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Author 6.2%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Author 4.3%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Author 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos