Keyword summary
0%5 analyzed articles/videos3,308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Graves results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and In-Group Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 917 hits. Analysis detected 7,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,232 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,792 of 37,321 keywords). This Sam Graves is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group.
Sam Graves
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
5%Sam Graves (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 13,232
Article count: 5
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.1% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate