Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 3,308 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sam Graves results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and In-Group Bias , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 917 hits . Analysis detected 7,078 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,232 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,792 of 37,321 keywords). This Sam Graves is better (less manipulative) than 95.90% of the peer group. Sam Graves
Keyword details
Total words: 13,232
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.1% percentile 1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst