U.S. Rep. Sam Graves ends reelection bid, setting up GOP scramble in northern Missouri 11%

By Jason Rosenbaum0%

3/27/2026, 6:52:21 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Unattributed Quote, and Hindsight Bias, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 304 faulty-reasoning hits from 331 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 28.1% and a BS Rank of 11% (19,476 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 89.00% of the article peer group.

A powerful Missouri Republican congressman is pulling the plug on his reelection bid. 
U.S. 
Rep. 
Sam Graves, R-Tarkio, said in a statement that he will bow out of the GOP primary for Missouri’s 6th Congressional District, which encompasses most of northern Missouri. 
He’s currently the head of the House Transportation Committee. 
“After considerable reflection, 2026 will be my final year in Congress,” Graves posted on Facebook. 
“This wasn’t an easy decision, but it’s the right one. 
I believe in making room for the next generation. 
It’s time to pass the torch and allow a new guard of conservative leaders to step forward and chart a path forward for Missourians.” 
While Graves, 62, filed for reelection, his departure had been rumored for weeks. 
Graves has been in elected office since the early 1990s. 
And if Democrats win the House this fall, as polls show they could, Graves would have less power for the foreseeable future. 
Graves’ departure could set up a scramble to succeed him. 
Potential candidates include Chris Stigall, a northwest Missouri native who hosts a nationally syndicated show on the Salem News Channel. 
He announced that he's running in a post on Friday. 
Other contenders include Kansas City Councilman Nathan Willett and state Rep. 
Mazzie Christensen, who could join Kansas City resident Jim Ingram in the Republican primary. 
Willett is running for a state Senate seat encompassing Platte and Buchanan counties, while Christensen represents a rural northern Missouri House district. 
The 6th District also takes in most of northeastern Missouri, a historically Democratic part of the state that’s become much more Republican-leaning in the past decade. 
The district is safely Republican, though it would become more Democratic under a new congressional map that may not be implemented for the 2026 election. 
Josh Smead, Scot Pondelick and Matt Levine have filed to run as Democrats for the seat. 
This is a developing story that will be updated. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.7%Availability Heuristic3.0%This article: 4.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic4.2%This article: 7.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Hindsight Bias7.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 8.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.3%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 7.6%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Status Quo Bias7.6%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 4.8%Optimism Bias2.7%This article: 14.2%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.9%Pessimism Bias14.2%This article: 3.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 6.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 7.1%Negativity Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.7%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.4%Halo Effect2.7%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.0%Recency Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 11.8%Jason Rosenbaum: 3.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.6%Appeal to Authority11.8%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.6%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 4.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.4%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 7.3%Jason Rosenbaum: 7.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 6.6%Appeal to Emotion7.3%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.5%Belleville News-Democrat: 2.6%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 11.5%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.2%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Unattributed Quote11.5%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.0%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 3.9%Jason Rosenbaum: 2.9%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.8%Biased Writer Voice3.9%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.3%Belleville News-Democrat: 1.1%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.8%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 1.7%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jason Rosenbaum: 0.1%Belleville News-Democrat: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

331 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker26%attributed speech246writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 15 words • 100.0% coverageSam Graves • 10 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 9 words • 0.0% coverageSam Graves • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Sam Graves

56%flagged-word coverage
85 attributed words100% of attributed speech70% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Unattributed Quote+8.3 ptsWriter: 9.3%Sam Graves: 17.6%17.6%Biased Writer Voice-5.3 ptsWriter: 5.3%Sam Graves: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.