Author summary
26%3 analyzed articles/videos3,282 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Andrew Khouri results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 1,351 hits. Analysis detected 11,806 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,997 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 10% (5,622 of 6,229 authors). This Andrew Khouri is better (less manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
Andrew Khouri
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
10%Andrew Khouri (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 17,997
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

10% percentile
02550751009.7% percentile
1.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles18K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.8%3.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.6%2.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.0%2.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 4.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate