Keyword summary
47% 10 analyzed articles/videos 6,928 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indianapolis results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Anecdotal , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 2,240 hits . Analysis detected 20,922 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,537 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 10% (34,104 of 37,536 keywords). This Indianapolis is better (less manipulative) than 90.90% of the peer group. Indianapolis
Keyword details
Total words: 28,537
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
9% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 9.1% percentile 1.5% BS Score10 analyzed articles28.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 5.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst