Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Emily Worrell results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Anecdotal, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 702 faulty-reasoning hits from 954 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,590 authors). This Emily Worrell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Emily Worrell
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Jacob Owens1%
1%Megan Fan Munce1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Emily Worrell (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 954
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles954 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 10.5%10.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 7.0%7.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 8.6%8.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 8.4%8.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 10.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 7.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.4%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.3%, sitewide 2.7%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos