Publication summary
16% 15 analyzed articles/videos 8,262 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mirror Indy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 1,804 hits . Analysis detected 14,926 faulty-reasoning hits from 31,108 analyzed words across 15 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 4% (386 of 400 publications). This Mirror Indy is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 31,108
Article count: 15
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.5% percentile 1.0% BS Score15 analyzed articles31.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.5% 3.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst