Head to this wellness writing workshop at The Whispering Shelf 1%

By Mary Claire Molloy1%

7/23/2026, 8:10:05 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 1 faulty reasoning type, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 8.3% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 15 faulty-reasoning hits from 180 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 1% (21,738 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 99.30% of the article peer group.

The Whispering Shelf, a bookstore in Lockerbie Square, is hosting a free writing workshop on Tuesday, Aug. 
4. 
From 6:30 to 7:30 p.m., participants will respond to different prompts related to the event’s theme: wellness. 
“It’s about self reflection,” said Emma Freund, the bookstore’s community and collections lead. 
“The topic is open-ended. 
You can write about how your week is going right now or something that’s been bothering you for years.” 
Pens and paper will be provided. 
If they’re comfortable, attendees can share what they wrote with the group. 
The Whispering Shelf is located at 414 N. 
College Ave. 
You can reserve a spot online. 
If you go 
Writing for Wellness Workshop 
🗓️ 6:30-7:30 p.m. 
Aug. 
4 
📍 The Whispering Shelf, 414 N. 
College Ave. 
🎟️ Free tickets 
Mirror Indy, a nonprofit newsroom, is funded through grants and donations from individuals, foundations and organizations. 
Sign up for our free newsletters. 
Mirror Indy reporter Mary Claire Molloy covers health. 
Reach her at 317-721-7648 or email maryclaire.molloy@mirrorindy.org. 
Follow her on X @mcmolloy7. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.3%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 2.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.5%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 3.4%Framing Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 3.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.1%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 5.9%Negativity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.2%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.3%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 2.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 3.7%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 2.2%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 1.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.3%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 4.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.2%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 3.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Mary Claire Molloy: 0.0%Mirror Indy: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.3%Mary Claire Molloy: 5.0%Mirror Indy: 1.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…8.3%

180 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker20%attributed speech144writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageEmma Freund • 13 words • 0.0% coverageEmma Freund • 4 words • 0.0% coverageEmma Freund • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Emma Freund

0%flagged-word coverage
36 attributed words100% of attributed speech10% writer coverage
0%7.5%15.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -10.4 ptsWriter: 10.4%Emma Freund: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.