Author summary
⁠7%5 analyzed articles/videos757 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Carley Lanich results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 14.5% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 1,086 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,271 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠56% (2,940 of 6,625 authors). This Carley Lanich is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group.
Carley Lanich
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠56%Carley Lanich (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,271
Article count: 5
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

56% percentile
025507510055.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score5 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.5%1.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 3.6%3.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 14.5%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Author 0.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos