Publication summary
18% 12 analyzed articles/videos 7,767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mirror Indy results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Hasty Generalization , and Optimism Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.4% saturation with 1,775 hits . Analysis detected 13,576 faulty-reasoning hits from 27,771 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 4% (372 of 386 publications). This Mirror Indy is better (less manipulative) than 96.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 27,771
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
4% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 3.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score12 analyzed articles27.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.4% 6.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.4% 1.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.7% 1.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.8% 3.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 4.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst