Author summary
50%1 analyzed article/video2,091 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hayleigh Colombo for IndyStar results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.2% saturation with 1,139 hits. Analysis detected 4,328 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,273 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 34% (4,235 of 6,368 authors). This Hayleigh Colombo for IndyStar is better (less manipulative) than 66.50% of the peer group.
Hayleigh Colombo for IndyStar
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
34%Hayleigh Colombo for IndyStar (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 6,273
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510033.5% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 1.9%1.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.3%2.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.6%3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 1.1%1.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 1.7%1.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 18.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.4%False Dilemma: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos