Chalkbeat15%

Untitled article 23%

7/15/2026, 6:20:45 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 10 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Appeal to Authority, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 50.6% saturation with 41 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 81 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 36.4% and a BS Rank of 23% (16,848 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 77.00% of the article peer group.

CPS lays off 162 employees as it works to close budget deficit for 2026-27 school year 
New campaign aims to dispel cannabis myths for NY teens after legalization 
Can they do that? 
Council sets vote on $10K perk for paraprofessionals 
Parental rights and student gender transitions will be civil rights priorities: top DOJ official 
Pennsylvania state budget includes $157 million more for Philadelphia’s schools 
What Detroiters should know about the proposed school operating millage on the Aug. 4 ballot 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.5%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.9%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.9%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 50.6%Chalkbeat: 9.5%Framing Effect50.6%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.2%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 12.3%Chalkbeat: 4.6%Optimism Bias12.3%This article: 4.9%Chalkbeat: 1.1%Pessimism Bias4.9%This article: 4.9%Chalkbeat: 10.0%Negativity Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.6%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.8%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 17.3%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Appeal to Authority17.3%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.3%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.4%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 1.4%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.4%Appeal to Emotion0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.1%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 2.1%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 17.3%Chalkbeat: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)17.3%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 4.9%Chalkbeat: 0.1%Personal Incredulity4.9%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.3%Chalkbeat: 1.1%Unattributed Quote17.3%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 4.7%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 18.5%Chalkbeat: 1.8%Indoctrination18.5%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Chalkbeat: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 14.8%Chalkbeat: 4.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…14.8%

81 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker17%attributed speech67writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of Justice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Department of Justice

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words100% of attributed speech61% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+100.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Department of Justice: 100.0%100.0%Indoctrination-22.4 ptsWriter: 22.4%Department of Justice: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -17.9 ptsWriter: 17.9%Department of Justice: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.