Speaker summary
39% 96 analyzed articles/videos 2,672.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department of Justice results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 15.5% saturation with 532.066 hits . Analysis detected 4,726.305 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,672.667 analyzed words across 96 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 1% (25,937 of 26,053 speakers). This Department of Justice is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group. Department of Justice
Speaker details
Total words: 2,672.667
Content count: 96
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score96 analyzed videos2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 8.4% 8.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.8% 4.8% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 8.0% 8.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Speaker 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 15.5% 15.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 8.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 15.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 8.0%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Speaker 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Speaker 1.3%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Special Pleading: Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.3% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/21/2026, 10:00:00 PM