Dems say ICE is retaliating against hunger striking detainees in New Jersey as protesters swarm Delaney Hall detention facility 74%

By Alex Woodward72%

5/26/2026, 9:12:48 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 39.2% saturation with 418 hits. Analysis detected 2,340 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,066 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,354 of 20,518 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.90% of the article peer group.

Dozens of protesters have spent days surrounding the gates of an immigration detention center where detainees are on hunger strike to protest what they have described as unconstitutional and inhumane conditions inside. 
Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in military gear with heavily armored police trucks remain in a standoff with protesters outside the Delaney Hall detention center in Newark, New Jersey, where agents have torn down makeshift barriers that protesters used to block vehicles from transferring detainees after clashes over Memorial Day weekend. 
Rep. 
Rob Menendez performed an oversight visit inside the facility on Tuesday, one day after federal agents hit Sen. 
Andy Kim with chemical agents and blocked the state’s governor Mikie Sherrill from entering. 
Menendez said the strike is still ongoing  conditions have not improved, medical care is “non-existent,” and Donald Trump’s administration appears to be retaliating against detainees by denying them visitations, he told reporters. 
“They want the focus, for all these cameras and the right-wing media, to be what’s happening outside here, to make that the story, because they don’t want the story to be about the individuals inside,” Menendez said. 
“They’re mothers, they’re fathers, they’re people who are married to U.S. citizens, people who have U.S. citizen children, people who are pregnant  that’s who’s inside.” 
Nearly 300 detainees signed an open letter last week alleging inadequate food and medical care and denial of due process rights. 
“We feel vulnerable and, in a way, kidnapped  detained without justification  not to mention that we are being tortured physically and psychologically due to the poor food resources provided in these detention centers,” they wrote. 
They signed the letter “S.O.S.” 
Advocacy groups say the detention center has cut off visitation hours and blocked access to tablet devices that detainees use to speak with family members. 
Several Democratic members of Congress who visited the facility said it’s also plagued by filthy bathrooms, inadequate medical care and abuse. 
Detainees also say they have been pressured to accept deportation to far-flung nations in Africa, including the Democratic Republic of the Congo, where global health authorities are battling a growing Ebola outbreak. 
Homeland Security has repeatedly denied that any detainees are hunger striking while accusing Democratic officials of “spreading smears” about the facility. 
“During hunger strikes, ICE continues to provide three meals a day, delivered to the detained alien’s room, and an adequate supply of drinking water or other beverages,” a spokesperson told The Independent. 
The agency provides “clean water, clothing, bedding, showers, soap, and toiletries,” and detainees have “access to phones to communicate with their family members and lawyers,” the spokesperson said. 
Homeland Security Secretary Markwanye Mullin called visits from Democratic officials a “political stunt.” 
DHS has also denied that anyone was hit by pepper balls and blamed demonstrators for escalating a protest that prompted officers to start firing into the crowd. 
“The First Amendment protects speech and peaceful assembly  not rioting,” the agency said Monday. 
Martin Soto, a Peruvian immigrant who had been detained at the facility since February and whose pregnant wife Gabriela has protested outside, is one of the organizers of the strike. 
He was moved out of the detention center and sent to the Elizabeth Contract Detention Facility on Monday. 
“The only reason to remove him to Elizabeth Detention Center is to get him away from the people that he's been around for the last several months, who he's been organizing with to raise awareness of the conditions,” Menendez said Tuesday. 
After he was caught in a cloud of pepper spray during Monday’s demonstrations, Senator Kim said he is pressing for the facility to restore all family visitation visits. 
“What I witnessed was really heartbreaking  just seeing Americans fighting other Americans in the streets, the level of division,” Kim told The New Jersey Monitor. 
“And it’s not just that, it’s what I heard and saw inside the detention facility.” 
Kim said he spoke with dozens of the 700-plus detainees inside the jail, including a pregnant woman who said she is not receiving medical attention and another woman whose family was unable to find out any information about her condition after she was hospitalized for two weeks. 
“They said they can’t divulge that information because of security purposes,” he told the outlet Tuesday. 
He said family members were instead told to file public information requests to get information about their loved ones. 
“I mean, that’s absurd,” he said. 
Amol Sinha, executive director of the ACLU of New Jersey, said immigrants’ families, lawmakers and others protesting the facility “should not face pepper spray and rubber bullets for doing so.” 
“Our federal representatives  who have the congressional authority to conduct oversight visits of the facility  have instead taken pepper spray to their eyes and experienced abuse at the hands of federal agents,” he said Tuesday. 
Sherrill, the state’s Democratic governor, said she was also denied entry into the building on Monday, “raising even more questions about what they are trying to hide from public view.” 
Immigrants, lawyers and members of Congress across the country are demanding urgent attention to the growing numbers of people in sprawling, prison-like facilities operated by President Donald Trump’s administration, which aims to deport at least 1 million people a year and hold as many as hold at least 99,000 people in ICE detention on any given day. 
The 1,000-bed, two-story facility in New Jersey opened May 1, 2025, and is run by private prison contractor GEO Group. 
ICE awarded the company a 15-year, $1 billion contract to run the facility near Newark Liberty International Airport, which has been used by the federal government to stage removal flights. 
GEO Group and the city of Newark have been locked in a legal battle for more than a year after city officials accused the firm of opening the facility without required permits and inspections. 
That suit is headed towards mediation; both sides have been ordered to complete talks by June 15. 
But the latest “alarming” updates from inside the detention center have prompted Newark Mayor Ras Baraka to press for state investigations into the facility and GEO Group, he announced Tuesday. 
“It is imperative that we take all necessary steps to uphold the rule of law, ensure accountability, and protect the dignity and rights of some,” he said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 20.1%Alex Woodward: 3.2%The Independent: 2.9%Confirmation Bias20.1%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.5%The Independent: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.4%Alex Woodward: 3.5%The Independent: 3.2%Availability Heuristic12.4%This article: 5.3%Alex Woodward: 0.9%The Independent: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic5.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.3%The Independent: 0.6%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 1.4%The Independent: 2.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Alex Woodward: 15.1%The Independent: 8.2%Framing Effect10.8%This article: 1.8%Alex Woodward: 0.2%The Independent: 0.5%Loss Aversion1.8%This article: 2.6%Alex Woodward: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Status Quo Bias2.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.5%Alex Woodward: 1.0%The Independent: 2.4%Optimism Bias2.5%This article: 6.5%Alex Woodward: 1.7%The Independent: 1.6%Pessimism Bias6.5%This article: 39.2%Alex Woodward: 19.7%The Independent: 12.1%Negativity Bias39.2%This article: 8.5%Alex Woodward: 2.5%The Independent: 2.5%Self-Serving Bias8.5%This article: 2.5%Alex Woodward: 1.0%The Independent: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error2.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.3%The Independent: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.4%Alex Woodward: 0.9%The Independent: 1.6%In-Group Bias4.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.5%The Independent: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.8%Alex Woodward: 1.0%The Independent: 2.2%Halo Effect2.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.2%The Independent: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.2%Alex Woodward: 1.2%The Independent: 1.5%Recency Bias6.2%This article: 1.8%Alex Woodward: 0.5%The Independent: 0.4%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.7%Alex Woodward: 2.4%The Independent: 2.2%Ad Hominem6.7%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Straw Man0.0%This article: 14.0%Alex Woodward: 5.1%The Independent: 3.8%Appeal to Authority14.0%This article: 5.3%Alex Woodward: 1.2%The Independent: 1.5%False Dilemma5.3%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 1.9%The Independent: 0.7%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 4.4%Alex Woodward: 4.9%The Independent: 4.1%Hasty Generalization4.4%This article: 2.8%Alex Woodward: 0.3%The Independent: 0.4%Red Herring2.8%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.6%The Independent: 0.6%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.0%Alex Woodward: 8.3%The Independent: 6.4%Appeal to Emotion20.0%This article: 5.9%Alex Woodward: 1.3%The Independent: 0.9%Begging the Question5.9%This article: 9.5%Alex Woodward: 2.1%The Independent: 2.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.5%This article: 2.5%Alex Woodward: 0.5%The Independent: 0.3%Tu Quoque2.5%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.7%The Independent: 0.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.0%The Independent: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 4.9%Alex Woodward: 2.1%The Independent: 2.2%Anecdotal4.9%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 3.2%Alex Woodward: 2.0%The Independent: 1.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)3.2%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.0%The Independent: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.5%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Middle Ground2.5%This article: 0.6%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.3%The Independent: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.2%The Independent: 0.1%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 5.6%Alex Woodward: 2.6%The Independent: 2.6%Unattributed Quote5.6%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 2.0%The Independent: 2.1%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 1.8%Alex Woodward: 11.3%The Independent: 7.9%Biased Writer Voice1.8%This article: 2.4%Alex Woodward: 0.5%The Independent: 1.3%Indoctrination2.4%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 4.9%The Independent: 2.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.7%The Independent: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alex Woodward: 0.1%The Independent: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1066 words analyzed.

Speakers

8speakers50%attributed speech532writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageRob Menendez • 33 words • 0.0% coverageRob Menendez • 37 words • 0.0% coverageRob Menendez • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageAdvocacy groups • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageHomeland Security • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageMarkwanye Mullin • 13 words • 0.0% coverageHomeland Security • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageRob Menendez • 41 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 28 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 26 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 15 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 47 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 16 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 19 words • 0.0% coverageSenator Kim • 6 words • 0.0% coverageAmol Sinha • 30 words • 0.0% coverageAmol Sinha • 37 words • 0.0% coverageMikie Sherrill • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 57 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageRas Baraka • 30 words • 0.0% coverageRas Baraka • 27 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Rob Menendez

100%flagged-word coverage
137 attributed words26% of attributed speech89% writer coverage
0%10.0%20.0%Indoctrination+19.0 ptsWriter: 0.0%Rob Menendez: 19.0%19.0%Unattributed Quote-11.3 ptsWriter: 11.3%Rob Menendez: 0.0%0.0%Biased Writer Voice-3.6 ptsWriter: 3.6%Rob Menendez: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.