Topic summary
58% 100 analyzed articles/videos 90,464 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Immigration Enforcement results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 44,564 hits . Analysis detected 379,733 faulty-reasoning hits from 387,282 analyzed words across 100 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 17% (12,799 of 15,327 topics). This Immigration Enforcement is better (less manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group. Immigration Enforcement
Topic details
Total words: 387,282
Article count: 100
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
17% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 16.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score100 analyzed articles387.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.2% 1.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst