Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Vermont Public Staff results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ambiguity (Equivocation) , and Overconfidence Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 181 hits . Analysis detected 1,181 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,264 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,362 authors). This Vermont Public Staff is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Vermont Public Staff
Author details
Total words: 2,264
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 0.5% 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.4% 2.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Anecdotal: Author 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Hindsight Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.5% Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst