Author summary
80% 1 analyzed article/video 1,552 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Emma Gallegos results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Appeal to Authority , and Negativity Bias , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 1,017 hits . Analysis detected 7,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,279 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 42% (3,660 of 6,263 authors). This Emma Gallegos is better (less manipulative) than 58.40% of the peer group. Emma Gallegos
Author details
Total words: 9,279
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
42% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 41.6% percentile 2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.7% 5.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.4% 8.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 10.2%, sitewide 11.1% Anecdotal: Author 11.0%, sitewide 5.2% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 1.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst