Author summary
19%1 analyzed article/video1,056 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Syra Ortiz Blanes results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.5% saturation with 365 hits. Analysis detected 1,757 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,168 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 48% (3,251 of 6,172 authors). This Syra Ortiz Blanes is better (less manipulative) than 52.70% of the peer group.
Syra Ortiz Blanes
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
48%Syra Ortiz Blanes (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,168
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

47% percentile
025507510047.3% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.3%3.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.1%5.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 11.5%11.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.4%0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.0%2.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Author 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.1%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Author 8.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.9%Indoctrination: Author 0.6%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos