Publication summary
19% 33 analyzed articles/videos 14,951 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Orlando Sentinel results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Framing Effect , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 1,549 hits . Analysis detected 16,454 faulty-reasoning hits from 25,572 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 19% (307 of 379 publications). This Orlando Sentinel is better (less manipulative) than 81.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 25,572
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.0% percentile 1.3% BS Score9 analyzed articles25.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 1.5% 1.5% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.4% 1.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 3.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 0.5% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst