Author summary
⁠43%1 analyzed article/video1,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Samantha Michaels results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 8% saturation with 470 hits. Analysis detected 3,786 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,865 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (3,663 of 6,171 authors). This Samantha Michaels is better (less manipulative) than 59.40% of the peer group.
Samantha Michaels
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠41%Samantha Michaels (selected)3%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 5,865
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

41% percentile
025507510040.6% percentile
2.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 4.4%4.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 5.9%5.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 5.7%5.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 1.3%1.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Author 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 2.1%2.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Author 3.0%, sitewide 1.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos