Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,866 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ava Chatlosh results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Framing Effect , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 599 hits . Analysis detected 5,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,598 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 44% (3,681 of 6,495 authors). This Ava Chatlosh is better (less manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group. Ava Chatlosh
Author details
Total words: 5,598
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 43.3% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 7.4% 7.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.0% 2.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.6% 4.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 7.1% 7.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 6.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 7.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst