Publication summary
92% 24 analyzed articles/videos 14,849 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Las Vegas Sun results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 7,671 hits . Analysis detected 67,439 faulty-reasoning hits from 64,402 analyzed words across 24 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 52% (194 of 398 publications). This Las Vegas Sun is worse (more manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 64,402
Article count: 24
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
51% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 51.4% percentile 2.0% BS Score24 analyzed articles64.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.9% 6.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.9% 11.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.4% 5.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.8% 1.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 9.3% 9.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 4.2% 4.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 8.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.4%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 9.3%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 3.8%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst