Author summary
⁠62%1 analyzed article/video406 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ray Brewer results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, Anchoring Bias, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 241 hits. Analysis detected 982 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (1,850 of 6,347 authors). This Ray Brewer is worse (more manipulative) than 70.90% of the peer group.
Ray Brewer
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
⁠71%Ray Brewer (selected)4%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,218
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

71% percentile
025507510070.9% percentile
3.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.0%2.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 19.8%19.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Author 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.5%3.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.2%3.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 4.5%4.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Author 19.8%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 8.5%, sitewide 1.9%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Author 7.5%, sitewide 4.0%Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 4.5%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Composition/Division: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.2%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Author 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Blind-Spot Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Author 1.3%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos