L.A. TACO85%

Demonstrators Hold 24-Hour Fast in Solidarity with Hunger Strike in Adelanto ICE Facilities 16%

By Aisha Wallace-Palomares61%

5/31/2026, 11:37:03 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.3% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 865 faulty-reasoning hits from 488 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 31.6% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,548 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the article peer group.

On Sunday morning at 6 a.m., more than a dozen people gathered in front. of the Alameda St. entrance of the Edward R. 
Roybal Federal Building in downtown Los Angeles in solidarity with the hunger strikes in ICE facilities across the country. 
Demonstrators told L.A. 
TACO they are fasting to show solidarity with, and bring attention to, the detainees who are participating in a hunger strike at Adelanto ICE Processing Center and Desert View Annex. 
They also said that they may extend the fast beyond the 24 hours. 
Some of the fasters will stay for the full 24 hours outside of the federal building. 
They are also joined by others supporting them remotely, for a total of nearly 50 people fasting in solidarity. 
Demonstrators stood on both sidewalks in front of the building, making art, hanging banners, and recording and yelling at the outgoing vehicles leaving the facility. 
They demand the following: bond reform, improved conditions, adequate medical and mental health care, nutritious food, accountability for deaths, the right to organize and communicate, and to shut down Adelanto. 
All three Adelanto ICE facilities are participating in a hunger strike, according to a post by the Inland Coalition for Immigrant Justice. 
The facilities are the East and West Wings of the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, and the Desert View Annex. 
The Instagram post also includes an audio message from one of the participants inside one of the facilities, who explains that they are on a hunger strike because the price for bail is too high: between $60,000 and $80,000. 
The hunger strike inside the Adelanto ICE facilities is one of at least five hunger strikes that have occurred at detention centers across the nation. 
L.A. 
TACO reported last week that at least 100 participants inside the Adelanto ICE Processing Center, and at least 20 people inside of the Desert View Annex, are on strike. 
There are 300 detainees inside of Delaney Hall facility in Newark, New Jersey. 
“The hunger strike tells you it’s been a year and nothing has been changed. 
They’re at the last point of starving themselves. 
It’s going to keep getting worse if people don’t wake up,” Lupe Mendoza, a fast participant, told L.A. 
TACO. 
“They made a difficult decision. 
They’re risking their own health, because their complaints, especially about all the concerning things happening inside these detention centers, aren’t being heard. 
This isn’t normal and we shouldn’t accept it as normal,” Bladimir Argueta, another participant, told LA TACO in Spanish. 
The N. 
Alameda St. entrance has been the site of daily presence of demonstrators since June of last year, according to Katherine Carreño, one of the organizers of the fast. 
In June, federal immigration agents were observed bringing people they detained to the facility. 
There are two areas where immigration detainees are held, sections B-17 and B-18. 
This is a developing story. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.3%L.A. TACO: 3.9%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 12.5%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.6%L.A. TACO: 4.1%Availability Heuristic12.5%This article: 5.1%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic5.1%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 1.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 1.7%Overconfidence Bias1.0%This article: 12.7%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 18.1%L.A. TACO: 11.5%Framing Effect12.7%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 3.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Status Quo Bias3.9%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 6.6%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.0%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Pessimism Bias6.6%This article: 21.3%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 19.0%L.A. TACO: 11.3%Negativity Bias21.3%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.1%L.A. TACO: 4.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.9%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.6%L.A. TACO: 6.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 11.7%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 1.0%Recency Bias11.7%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.4%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.1%L.A. TACO: 1.2%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 16.2%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 4.8%L.A. TACO: 3.6%Appeal to Authority16.2%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.1%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 5.3%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Slippery Slope5.3%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 8.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 3.3%L.A. TACO: 5.8%Hasty Generalization8.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.3%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Red Herring0.0%This article: 3.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.5%L.A. TACO: 1.3%Bandwagon3.9%This article: 9.8%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 15.4%L.A. TACO: 10.8%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 3.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.2%L.A. TACO: 0.9%Begging the Question3.9%This article: 4.5%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 2.1%L.A. TACO: 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.5%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.3%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 10.9%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 9.2%L.A. TACO: 5.7%Anecdotal10.9%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.1%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.8%L.A. TACO: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.1%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.0%L.A. TACO: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.1%L.A. TACO: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.5%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 17.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 1.7%L.A. TACO: 1.4%Unattributed Quote17.0%This article: 1.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.7%L.A. TACO: 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection1.0%This article: 5.7%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 5.1%L.A. TACO: 8.7%Biased Writer Voice5.7%This article: 10.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.8%L.A. TACO: 2.0%Indoctrination10.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 2.6%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.2%L.A. TACO: 0.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Aisha Wallace-Palomares: 0.6%L.A. TACO: 2.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

488 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers34%attributed speech323writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageInland Coalition for Immigrant Justice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 39 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageL.A. TACO • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageLupe Mendoza • 14 words • 0.0% coverageLupe Mendoza • 8 words • 0.0% coverageLupe Mendoza • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageBladimir Argueta • 5 words • 100.0% coverageBladimir Argueta • 22 words • 0.0% coverageBladimir Argueta • 19 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageKatherine Carreño • 28 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Bladimir Argueta

100%flagged-word coverage
46 attributed words28% of attributed speech68% writer coverage
0%22.5%45.0%Indoctrination+32.0 ptsWriter: 9.3%Bladimir Argueta: 41.3%41.3%Unattributed Quote-25.7 ptsWriter: 25.7%Bladimir Argueta: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection+10.9 ptsWriter: 0.0%Bladimir Argueta: 10.9%10.9%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.