Topic summary
⁠32%3 analyzed articles/videos740 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hunger Strike results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 834 hits. Analysis detected 6,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,716 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠35% (10,165 of 15,447 topics). This Hunger Strike is better (less manipulative) than 65.80% of the peer group.
Hunger Strike
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,716
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

34% percentile
025507510034.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.6%5.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.4%12.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.0%2.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.1%0.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 5.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.0%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos