Speaker summary
⁠76%1 analyzed article/video61.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Bladimir Argueta results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 239.25 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 32.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (14,045 of 28,364 speakers). This Bladimir Argueta is worse (more manipulative) than 50.50% of the peer group.
Bladimir Argueta
Speaker details
Total words: 61.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

51% percentile
025507510050.5% percentile
32.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos61.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 41.3%41.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Speaker 31.0%31.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 23.9%23.9%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 20.6%20.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 44.6%44.6%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 8.2%8.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Speaker 44.6%, sitewide 26.9%Indoctrination: Speaker 41.3%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Speaker 31.0%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 23.9%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 20.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos