Author summary
9%1 analyzed article/video1,162 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Larkins results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Availability Heuristic as the most egregious example at 4% saturation with 141 hits. Analysis detected 1,013 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,486 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of 14% (5,523 of 6,367 authors). This Laura Larkins is better (less manipulative) than 86.70% of the peer group.
Laura Larkins
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
14%Laura Larkins (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 3,486
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

13% percentile
025507510013.3% percentile
1.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.2%3.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.8%1.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos