‘She followed the rules’ says lawyer for woman arrested by ICE at Denver International Airport 9%

By Laura Larkins10% American Community Media10%

7/23/2026, 12:31:41 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 18 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Availability Heuristic, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 9.1% saturation with 106 hits. Analysis detected 665 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,162 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 25% and a BS Rank of 9% (20,122 of 21,887 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 91.90% of the article peer group.

Plainclothes officers arrested Chantal Morales Rojas, a 27-year-old Ecuadorian woman, as she was boarding her Southwest Airlines flight from Denver to Oakland on the night of July 20. 
Friends of Rojas, fellow passengers, and airline employees watched as immigration agents detained Rojas on the jetway before taking her by force to a Homeland Security van waiting on the tarmac. 
The arrest comes amid a dramatic uptick in immigrant detentions, with ICE reporting some 43,000 arrests in June of this year. 
ICE’s presence at airports also appears to be increasing, with recent arrests at SFO and at LAX, where ICE agents reportedly left a Vietnamese man handcuffed. 
Rojas was visiting friends and her former employer in Denver for an ultimate frisbee tournament. 
She went through the TSA Security checkpoint Monday evening without any issue. 
Upon arrival at her gate for her flight to Oakland, a non-uniformed agent approached Rojas and asked if she could answer questions about her visa. 
Unaware that the man was an agent (he provided no identification), she said no. 
Alicia Dantzker, along with an attorney, both from the Bay Area and friends of Rojas’ former employer who also attended the tournament, happened to be traveling on the same flight. 
Rojas explained to them that she felt threatened and had no idea who the man was or why he was asking her about her visa. 
Within minutes, several other men, all in civilian clothing, arrived at the gate. 
The group stood by watching Rojas for the next thirty minutes. 
Dantzker says when she and Rojas scanned their boarding pass and stepped onto the jetway, the scanning console sounded an alarm and the Southwest agent asked them to wait. 
It was then that the men who had been surveilling Rojas pushed both women into the jetway and the door slammed shut, effectively trapping them. 
It is unclear who shut the door. 
“They said, ‘We are going to be polite. 
We have a warrant for your arrest,” Dantzker recounted. 
“You have to come with us. 
We have a warrant. 
Do you want to see it?’” 
Dantzker says she told the agents to show the warrant to her lawyer friend, by then standing on the other side of the door. 
That is also when she began to film the encounter. 
In the video, Rojas is seen being removed from the jetway and forced by several individuals out an exterior door. 
It is unclear if the individuals, including one woman, were agents, airport employees, or bystanders, though they appeared to be wearing all-access badges issued by airport authorities. 
A spokesperson for Denver Mayor Mike Johnston told a local news outlet after Rojas’ arrest that his office had not been informed of activity at the airport, adding the mayor does not have the legal authority to impede federal law enforcement at Denver International. 
Officials with Denver International Airport released a statement noting that federal agents do have jurisdiction there and are “not required to inform the airport of their activity.” 
Rojas was taken down the exterior stairway onto the tarmac and placed in a white van marked Homeland Security parked amongst the Southwest Airlines baggage carts. 
The warrant was never shown to the attorney present, despite the request for agents to do so. 
In the video, a federal agent confronts Dantzker, warning her not to interfere. 
Dantzker is later heard shouting epithets at the agents before she is approached by a Southwest employee. 
“I am just going to give you a heads up, if you’re on this flight and you speak to them [agents] like that, you will not board this flight,” he says. 
Dantzker, who was visibly upset and yelling, was ultimately not allowed to board the flight home. 
In an emailed response, ICE stated, “On July 20, 2026, ICE arrested Chantal Alejandra Morales Rojas, an illegal alien from Ecuador. 
She entered the country on October 20, 2024, on a visa that would allow her to stay in the country until January 4, 2025. 
In violation of our nation’s laws, she overstayed her visa. 
She remains in ICE custody pending removal proceedings.” 
Rojas’ attorney, Laura Lichter, disputes ICE’s account. 
”Chantal came to the United States lawfully in early 2023 on a J-1 exchange visitor visa as an au pair,” said Lichter. 
“She followed the rules of her program and, before it ended, timely filed an application with U.S. immigration authorities that allowed her to remain in the country while her case has been pending.” 
Lichter added, “For more than three years, she has continued to live here with federal authorization and has worked legally under employment authorization issued by the U.S. government.” 
Rojas has been working as a software developer for an inclusive recycling app company in Oakland. 
She had never been issued a deportation order or been notified that she was on any list of people targeted for deportation. 
Rojas was taken to the Aurora ICE Processing Center, also referred to as the Denver Contract Detention Facility, where she is currently being detained. 
In a blog post, Austin Kocher, assistant research professor at Syracuse University who has spent nearly two decades mapping immigration enforcement, notes daily ICE arrests have spiked to over 1,300 in June. 
Some 65,765 people are also now in ICE detention. 
“Of those people held in detention, the largest group continues to be immigrants with no criminal history whatsoever,” writes Kocher, “reinforcing the now longstanding observation that the agency is not targeting the worst of the worst.” 
Colorado has a history of such arrests. 
On May 12, 2026, U.S. 
District Court Judge R. 
Brooke Jackson found that federal immigration officers in the state had been arresting individuals without proper warrants in violation of their due process rights, and without checking to see if the person being arrested was likely to flee. 
The court order required additional training for immigration officers in Colorado and laid out specific protocol for documentation of flight risk and identification of officers in warrantless arrests. 
In 2018, Southwest Airlines joined a coalition of Texas businesses publicly backing immigrants by supporting the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) initiative. 
“We do not wish to have involvement in the process of separating children from their parents,” the airline said in a statement at the time. 
Southwest did not respond to requests for comment on Rojas’s arrest or their current policy regarding cooperation with immigration enforcement. 
The Transportation Safety Administration does share traveler information with ICE. 
Both agencies are under the Department of Homeland Security. 
Rojas’ friends and family, meanwhile, are working with an attorney to ensure her safety and right to due process. 
“I care for her like she is my daughter,” said Lauren Cahr, the mother for whom Rojas worked as an au pair. 
“She is a part of my family. 
She has never hurt anyone and just lives a quiet life. 
She came here legally and tried to do everything right.” 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 2.8%Laura Larkins: 0.9%Denver Westword: 1.6%Confirmation Bias2.8%This article: 0.8%Laura Larkins: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.2%Anchoring Bias0.8%This article: 4.6%Laura Larkins: 4.0%Denver Westword: 2.2%Availability Heuristic4.6%This article: 3.1%Laura Larkins: 1.0%Denver Westword: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic3.1%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.5%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 1.2%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.0%Laura Larkins: 2.4%Denver Westword: 3.2%Framing Effect4.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.9%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.5%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Laura Larkins: 0.3%Denver Westword: 3.0%Optimism Bias0.9%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.5%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 2.2%Laura Larkins: 3.7%Denver Westword: 4.1%Negativity Bias2.2%This article: 2.8%Laura Larkins: 0.9%Denver Westword: 0.9%Self-Serving Bias2.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.9%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Laura Larkins: 0.8%Denver Westword: 3.8%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 1.1%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Straw Man0.0%This article: 9.1%Laura Larkins: 3.0%Denver Westword: 2.9%Appeal to Authority9.1%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.4%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 2.7%Laura Larkins: 0.9%Denver Westword: 0.6%Slippery Slope2.7%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 2.4%Laura Larkins: 1.8%Denver Westword: 2.4%Hasty Generalization2.4%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.3%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.2%Laura Larkins: 3.2%Denver Westword: 4.5%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.2%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.5%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.8%Laura Larkins: 0.3%Denver Westword: 0.1%Composition/Division0.8%This article: 3.2%Laura Larkins: 1.1%Denver Westword: 2.2%Anecdotal3.2%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 4.5%Laura Larkins: 1.5%Denver Westword: 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)4.5%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.2%Laura Larkins: 1.4%Denver Westword: 0.9%Unattributed Quote4.2%This article: 1.8%Laura Larkins: 1.0%Denver Westword: 0.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.8%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 3.0%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.7%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 0.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.6%Denver Westword: 0.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Laura Larkins: 0.0%Denver Westword: 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1162 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.