Author summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 18,028 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Efrat Lachter results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Authority , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 6,957 hits . Analysis detected 62,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 65,109 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 25% (4,637 of 6,162 authors). This Efrat Lachter is better (less manipulative) than 75.20% of the peer group. Efrat Lachter
Author details
Total words: 65,109
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.8% percentile 1.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles65.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 10.7% 10.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 10.0% 10.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.7% 3.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.4% 2.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 1.9% 1.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 10.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 8.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Pessimism Bias: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% False Dilemma: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst