Author summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 7,163 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alejandro Avila results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25% saturation with 7,248 hits . Analysis detected 49,166 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,002 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 65% (2,146 of 6,135 authors). This Alejandro Avila is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group. Alejandro Avila
Author details
Total words: 29,002
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
65% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 65.0% percentile 3.3% BS Score16 analyzed articles29K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 24.3% 24.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.0% 11.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.6% 2.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 5.1% 5.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.8% 0.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 4.5% 4.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.2% 2.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 11.0% 11.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 25.0%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 24.3%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.9%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 5.1%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 7.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst