OutKick87%

WNBA commissioner Cathy Engelbert condemns 'hate' against Alyssa Thomas while Caitlin Clark stays exposed 84%

By Alejandro Avila0%

7/1/2026, 9:53:59 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 20 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 69.8% saturation with 391 hits. Analysis detected 1,562 faulty-reasoning hits from 560 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,425 of 20,369 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 83.20% of the article peer group.

WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert folded under pressure late Tuesday night by issuing a reactionary statement after Phoenix Mercury forward Alyssa Thomas publicly shamed her for a lack of support. 
It's a great reminder that behind every incompetent league is bad judgment. 
Engelbert capitulated hours after Thomas, a lightning rod for controversy following her latest violent on-court altercation with Caitlin Clark, cast herself as the victim. 
Thomas successfully deflected from the fact that she had just been suspended for striking the league's golden goose. 
**SUSPENDED ALYSSA THOMAS BLASTS WNBA'S SILENCE AFTER CAITLIN CLARK FOUL, OFFERS NO ACCOUNTABILITY** 
Despite earning the suspension that fueled the backlash, Thomas still turned herself into the victim, blasted Engelbert and the commissioner predictably folded. 
"The WNBA vehemently condemns any and all forms of hate," Engelbert said in the statement on Tuesday. 
One has to wonder where fists to the throat rank on the commissioner's list of priorities. 
The statement amounted to a complete submission to Thomas, who used her Tuesday media availability to blast Engelbert. 
"The safety and well-being of everyone in our community is always the league's top priority. 
We are aware of Alyssa Thomas' comments, and what she and her teammates have experienced is completely unacceptable and not representative of the WNBA community. 
The league and our security team have been in contact with the Phoenix Mercury organization and remain committed to protecting all players." 
Rather than hold Thomas to her action, Engelbert bent a knee to the wrong player. 
During a loose-ball scramble, Thomas struck Fever superstar Caitlin Clark in the throat with her fist. 
While officials on the floor inexplicably missed it, the league office later upgraded the play to a Flagrant 2 and slapped Thomas with a retroactive one-game suspension for a "non-basketball act." 
Fever coach Stephanie White called the initial no-call "absolutely unacceptable," and Clark ultimately exited the game with a back injury. 
Instead of answering for endangering a fellow player, Thomas displayed an astonishing lack of accountability, claiming, "A lot of us, myself included, didn't even know the play took place until after the game." 
She then complained that her team was being "painted as thugs," cited severe online harassment and attacked the WNBA for failing to properly notify her of the suspension. 
"Honestly, I didn't even know I was being suspended until 10 minutes before it was put on social media," Thomas said, taking a direct shot at the commissioner. 
"As usual, she remains silent." 
**CAITLIN CLARK CALLS FOR 'GREAT LEADERSHIP,' SOPHIE CUNNINGHAM DOUBLES DOWN ON WNBA COMMISSIONER CONDEMNATION** 
Engelbert took the bait. 
The league office showed it was more interested in validating Thomas' grievances than protecting its biggest gate attraction. 
Engelbert has consistently mismanaged the overt physical hostility directed at the league's biggest star. 
Hard fouls are routinely minimized, and meaningful discipline often arrives only after public outrage forces the league's hand. 
**CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP** 
By validating the self-perceived victimhood of a player who had just been suspended for a "non-basketball act" against Clark, Engelbert's administration exposed its priorities. 
The WNBA continues to coddle veteran players who resent Clark's spotlight instead of enforcing a consistent standard of player safety. 
Engelbert made her choice. 
It wasn't Caitlin Clark. 
**Send us your thoughts: alejandro.avila@outkick.com / Follow along on X: @alejandroaveela** 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 7.2%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Alejandro Avila: 5.1%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic3.2%This article: 4.5%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.5%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.5%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.3%Alejandro Avila: 25.0%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect7.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 69.8%Alejandro Avila: 17.4%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias69.8%This article: 11.4%Alejandro Avila: 2.3%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias11.4%This article: 15.4%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error15.4%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias3.6%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.2%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 3.4%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias3.4%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 24.3%Alejandro Avila: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem24.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.4%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.3%Alejandro Avila: 3.8%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma7.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 19.5%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization19.5%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.5%Alejandro Avila: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.5%This article: 8.8%Alejandro Avila: 11.0%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion8.8%This article: 12.5%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question12.5%This article: 9.8%Alejandro Avila: 3.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)9.8%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Alejandro Avila: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.2%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 6.8%Alejandro Avila: 2.8%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)6.8%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 2.3%Alejandro Avila: 1.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.3%This article: 62.3%Alejandro Avila: 24.3%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice62.3%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Alejandro Avila: 4.5%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.4%Alejandro Avila: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.4%

560 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers24%attributed speech428writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 100.0% coverageCathy Engelbert • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageCathy Engelbert • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWNBA • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWNBA • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 100.0% coverageStephanie White • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 100.0% coverageAlyssa Thomas • 28 words • 0.0% coverageAlyssa Thomas • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

WNBA

53%flagged-word coverage
47 attributed words36% of attributed speech97% writer coverage
0%42.5%85.0%Biased Writer Voice-81.5 ptsWriter: 81.5%WNBA: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-3.0 ptsWriter: 3.0%WNBA: 0.0%0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.9 ptsWriter: 1.9%WNBA: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.