Speaker summary
⁠43%2 analyzed articles/videos78 analyzed words
BS Summary: These WNBA results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Representativeness Heuristic as the most egregious example at 32.1% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 25 faulty-reasoning hits from 78 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 32.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠50% (13,548 of 26,953 speakers). This WNBA is better (less manipulative) than 50.30% of the peer group.
WNBA
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 78
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

50% percentile
025507510049.7% percentile
32.1% BS Score2 analyzed videos78 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.0%32.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 32.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness HeuristicSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos