Topic summary
51% 14 analyzed articles/videos 10,375 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Wnba results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 4,416 hits . Analysis detected 35,276 faulty-reasoning hits from 41,085 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 12% (14,430 of 16,357 topics). This Wnba is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group. Wnba
Topic details
Total words: 41,085
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
12% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 11.8% percentile 1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles41.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.9% 3.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 10.8% 10.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst