Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video560 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathy Engelbert results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 62% saturation with 1,388 hits. Analysis detected 4,872 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,240 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (1,509 of 15,781 topics). This Cathy Engelbert is worse (more manipulative) than 90.40% of the peer group.
Cathy Engelbert
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,240
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

90% percentile
025507510090.4% percentile
9.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 62.0%62.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 20.3%20.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.5%35.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 17.9%17.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 18.4%18.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 6.5%6.5%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 7.7%7.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 62.0%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.5%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 26.9%Ad Hominem: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 2.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 2.7%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%False Dilemma: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%Straw Man: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.9%Burden of Proof: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos