Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos1,399 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alyssa Thomas results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 33.3% saturation with 1,861 hits. Analysis detected 8,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,596 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (5,698 of 15,447 topics). This Alyssa Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Alyssa Thomas
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,596
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 33.3%33.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.6%8.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 33.3%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 22.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%False Dilemma: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.8%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos