Keyword summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 7,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Indiana Fever results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 5,681 hits . Analysis detected 38,627 faulty-reasoning hits from 39,760 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 21% (27,362 of 34,500 keywords). This Indiana Fever is better (less manipulative) than 79.30% of the peer group. Indiana Fever
Keyword details
Total words: 39,760
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score14 analyzed articles39.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 14.3% 14.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 14.1% 14.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 14.3%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst