Author summary
42%4 analyzed articles/videos3,065 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Max Winters results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,576 hits. Analysis detected 9,382 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,260 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,662 of 6,234 authors). This Max Winters is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group.
Max Winters
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
26%Max Winters (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,260
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

25% percentile
025507510025.2% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles12.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.9%3.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.8%12.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.4%3.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.7%1.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.9%0.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Author 8.6%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Author 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate