Author summary
34% 5 analyzed articles/videos 4,208 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Isabel Baldwin results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Halo Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.2% saturation with 2,299 hits . Analysis detected 14,654 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,774 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,495 of 6,136 authors). This Isabel Baldwin is better (less manipulative) than 73.30% of the peer group. Isabel Baldwin
Author details
Total words: 18,774
Article count: 5
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.7% percentile 1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles18.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.7% 7.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.3% 12.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.8% 1.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.2% 10.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.2%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 5.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.7% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Bandwagon: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst