Revealed: Golf legend Phil Mickelson pulled out of The Open before being hit with new sexual misconduct claims 37%

By Isabel Baldwin34% Ben Nagle0%

6/27/2026, 5:54:45 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 334 hits. Analysis detected 1,621 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,090 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 43.7% and a BS Rank of 37% (12,962 of 20,366 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 63.60% of the article peer group.

Six-time major champion Phil Mickelson has officially pulled out of next month's Open Championship as the fallout from his bombshell sexual misconduct storm continues. 
Mickelson has played just one tournament on the breakaway LIV Golf tour this year, citing a family health emergency as the reason for his absence from the course. 
And it now appears he will not be back at Royal Birkdale, where he has an exemption to play until he is 60 as a former champion - winning back in 2013 at Muirfield. 
The news of Mickelson's Open absence comes just hours after a bombshell report on his private life was published by The Telegraph - written by legendary golf writer Alan Shipnuck. 
In the piece, Mickelson is accused of allegedly showing a naked photograph of himself with an erect penis to the wife of fellow Tour professional Pat Perez during a tournament in 2015. 
Phil Mickelson hasn't played in a professional tournament since LIV Golf South Africa in March 
Mickelson, pictured with his wife Amy, stepped away from golf indefinitely earlier in the year 
Ashley Perez, who was married to Pat from 2014 to 2023, told the outlet the incident occurred during the Barclays tournament in New Jersey, when Mickelson arranged for the couple to join him at his villa at Liberty National Golf Course. 
While Pat had excused himself to use the restroom, leaving Ashley and Mickelson alone on the patio, she claims the six-time major champion produced his phone and showed her a full-body image of himself naked and aroused. 
'Phil says to me, "I'm going to leave my bedroom door open tonight. 
When Pat falls asleep I want you to come see me",' Ashley told Shipnuck. 
According to the outlet, she said she declined his advances and did not immediately tell her husband, saying she had not wanted to create a scene mid-tournament. 
When Perez was eventually told, he confronted Mickelson - who the outlet reports ultimately apologized during a corporate outing at the Madison Club in La Quinta, California. 
The allegation became central to Perez's now-notorious comments on Claude Harmon's podcast in November 2022, when he said: 'I have a different hate for Phil than most people. 
'Phil crossed the line with me that is just uncrossable and unforgivable. 
He knows that he screwed up. 
He apologized for the action, but I cannot forgive him for it.' 
Ashley Perez says she has a recording of a subsequent 26-minute phone call between Pat and Mickelson. 
During it, she claims, Mickelson alternated between contrition and saying he could not remember the details of the evening. 
Shipnuck also reports he has listened to the recording. 
Mickelson will not play in The Open Championship this year. 
He won the tournament in 2013 
Mickelson has been accused of showing a photo of himself naked and erect to Ashley Perez (left) in 2015, then-wife of fellow golfer Pat Perez 
When Pat told him he had shown Ashley 'a naked photo', Mickelson is alleged to have responded: 'You mean topless?' 
Without fully admitting what had happened, Mickelson is said to have told the couple: 'I can't tell you how disgusted and embarrassed I am in myself.' 
The allegations against Mickelson, 56, come amid a separate and already-public scandal involving the six-time major champion. 
Earlier this month, Golf Digest reported that Mickelson had been removed as a member of The Farms Golf Club in Rancho Santa Fe, California, amid allegations of inappropriate physical contact with a female staff member. 
According to multiple sources, Mickelson approached the employee in the clubhouse, made non-consensual and inappropriate physical contact with her, and he was confronted by club officials mid-round before being told to vacate the premises. 
A representative confirmed he had resigned from the club. 
The Skratch report paints the incidents as part of a deeply entrenched pattern of behavior. 
Mickelson had previously departed two other high-end clubs - the Madison Club and The Bridges, also in Rancho Santa Fe - with sources at both saying personal conduct was a primary factor. 
Golf Digest reported that Mickelson, 55, has also been banned from The Farms Golf Club , an exclusive property not far from his home in San Diego, where he was a member 
Mickelson is pictured with his team - including wife Amy and his three kids - at the 2013 Open 
A woman who attended a dinner with Mickelson during the same period describes an encounter she characterizes as deeply disturbing. 
'Out of nowhere, Phil started asking the most inappropriate questions about my personal life and then propositioning me in graphic detail,' she told Skratch. 
'He went on and on about how he had been fantasizing about me and all the things he wanted to do to me. 
It was horrible.' 
Ashley Perez also describes a separate dinner - predating the nude photo incident - at which she claims Mickelson 'kept taking' conversation 'somewhere very dark and sexual', making graphic gestures at the table. 
In the statement provided to Skratch, a spokeswoman for Mickelson said: 'Some of the allegations circulating about Mr Mickelson are false, and others revisit mistakes he has already acknowledged, publicly or privately. 
Recovery is not a straight line. 
Mr Mickelson's priority is to become the husband, father, and man his family deserves.' 
Mickelson has not competed since LIV Golf's South Africa event in March and has cited a private family health matter for his absence. 
He missed the Masters, skipped the PGA Championship, and - his five-year exemption from the 2021 PGA Championship having now expired - was not extended a special invitation to this week's US Open at Shinnecock Hills. 
A display of his achievements in The Farms clubhouse has since been removed. 
Mickelson's Open decision surfaced just hours after new bombshell allegations were made 
Ashley Perez says she has a recording of a 26-minute phone call between Pat and Mickelson. 
In a statement provided to The California Post on Friday, Mickelson's attorney, Tom Clare, offered a scathing assessment of the allegations. 
'A small segment of the golf media has decided that because Mr. 
Mickelson is a successful golfer, every detail of his private and family life is theirs to exploit,' the lawyer said. 
'Recycling mistakes he has already acknowledged as new reporting, and dragging private family matters into public view, is reckless. 
It is the pursuit of clicks at the expense of the truth. 
Do better.' 
The Daily Mail has reached out to Mickelson's representatives for comment. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 3.7%Isabel Baldwin: 1.6%Daily Mail: 3.7%Confirmation Bias3.7%This article: 3.3%Isabel Baldwin: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.0%Anchoring Bias3.3%This article: 13.4%Isabel Baldwin: 2.9%Daily Mail: 3.5%Availability Heuristic13.4%This article: 1.4%Isabel Baldwin: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic1.4%This article: 3.1%Isabel Baldwin: 2.7%Daily Mail: 0.8%Hindsight Bias3.1%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.8%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 7.7%Isabel Baldwin: 3.5%Daily Mail: 9.1%Framing Effect7.7%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 2.9%Isabel Baldwin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.4%Status Quo Bias2.9%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 1.0%Daily Mail: 2.3%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 1.2%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.6%Isabel Baldwin: 12.2%Daily Mail: 12.8%Negativity Bias30.6%This article: 7.1%Isabel Baldwin: 4.0%Daily Mail: 2.0%Self-Serving Bias7.1%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.3%Daily Mail: 1.2%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.8%Daily Mail: 1.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%Isabel Baldwin: 5.3%Daily Mail: 4.5%Halo Effect2.3%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.6%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%Isabel Baldwin: 2.4%Daily Mail: 1.6%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.4%Daily Mail: 0.5%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.9%Isabel Baldwin: 1.3%Daily Mail: 1.7%Ad Hominem2.9%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 13.7%Isabel Baldwin: 2.2%Daily Mail: 4.0%Appeal to Authority13.7%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.5%Daily Mail: 1.2%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 11.4%Isabel Baldwin: 1.8%Daily Mail: 4.3%Hasty Generalization11.4%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 1.0%Daily Mail: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 5.2%Isabel Baldwin: 7.7%Daily Mail: 7.5%Appeal to Emotion5.2%This article: 0.6%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.6%Begging the Question0.6%This article: 6.1%Isabel Baldwin: 2.9%Daily Mail: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.1%This article: 1.7%Isabel Baldwin: 0.3%Daily Mail: 0.2%Tu Quoque1.7%This article: 2.9%Isabel Baldwin: 0.6%Daily Mail: 0.5%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.1%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 12.6%Isabel Baldwin: 2.5%Daily Mail: 3.1%Anecdotal12.6%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.8%Isabel Baldwin: 2.2%Daily Mail: 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.8%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.1%Daily Mail: 0.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 2.2%Daily Mail: 3.8%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 1.7%Isabel Baldwin: 1.8%Daily Mail: 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection1.7%This article: 7.4%Isabel Baldwin: 10.2%Daily Mail: 9.2%Biased Writer Voice7.4%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.5%Daily Mail: 0.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.0%Daily Mail: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Isabel Baldwin: 0.2%Daily Mail: 0.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

1090 words analyzed.

Speakers

5speakers21%attributed speech863writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 18 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Perez • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Perez • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coveragePat Perez • 12 words • 0.0% coveragePat Perez • 6 words • 0.0% coveragePat Perez • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Perez • 17 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Perez • 19 words • 0.0% coverageAlan Shipnuck • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 35 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageAshley Perez • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 100.0% coverageAshley Perez • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageTom Clare • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTom Clare • 20 words • 0.0% coverageTom Clare • 19 words • 0.0% coverageTom Clare • 12 words • 0.0% coverageTom Clare • 2 words • 0.0% coverageDaily Mail • 11 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Tom Clare

97%flagged-word coverage
65 attributed words29% of attributed speech81% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Biased Writer Voice-9.4 ptsWriter: 9.4%Tom Clare: 0.0%0.0%Quote-first Misdirection-2.1 ptsWriter: 2.1%Tom Clare: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.