Topic summary
72% 9 analyzed articles/videos 5,820 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sexual Misconduct Allegations results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Framing Effect , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 3,112 hits . Analysis detected 25,000 faulty-reasoning hits from 23,030 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 28% (12,018 of 16,562 topics). This Sexual Misconduct Allegations is better (less manipulative) than 72.60% of the peer group. Sexual Misconduct Allegations
Topic details
Total words: 23,030
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.4% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles23K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 9.6% 9.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst