Author summary
70%4 analyzed articles/videos4,741 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Cathy Young results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Ad Hominem, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 17.8% saturation with 3,996 hits. Analysis detected 25,976 faulty-reasoning hits from 22,504 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 45% (3,547 of 6,358 authors). This Cathy Young is better (less manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group.
Cathy Young
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
45%Cathy Young (selected)3%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 22,504
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

44% percentile
025507510044.2% percentile
2.4% BS Score4 analyzed articles22.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 17.8%17.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 12.7%12.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 3.3%3.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.5%2.5%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 5.1%5.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 8.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 12.7%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Author 17.8%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 5.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 5.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Author 5.1%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos