Keyword summary
0% 7 analyzed articles/videos 3,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Phoenix Mercury results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 3,979 hits . Analysis detected 22,103 faulty-reasoning hits from 16,686 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (18,328 of 35,635 keywords). This Phoenix Mercury is better (less manipulative) than 51.40% of the peer group. Phoenix Mercury
Keyword details
Total words: 16,686
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.6% percentile 2.8% BS Score7 analyzed articles16.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 23.9% 23.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.7% 9.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 23.9%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst